this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
429 points (85.9% liked)

Technology

59308 readers
6113 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What about solid state batteries that can charge in 2 minutes instead of one hour? And have better capacity and a longer life?

[–] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

As soon as they figure out how to actually mass produce them at an affordable price, and fix the swelling issues during high charging currents, they'll be available.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

They've been as good predicting when this will happen as Elon has been about FSD.

It's always just around the corner.

Although it really does seem like we might start seeing soon this time at least in low volume expensive things.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I want a semi-solid state batter that turns kinetic energy into stored charge. I want to be able to drop it on the ground, fire a .45 round into it, and have it immediately be fully charged.

[–] missing_forklift@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

this article is about changes to solid electrolyte only, you'd know that if you read the article. these have less conductivity ( = lower power density) tho

And have better capacity and a longer life?

it took 9 months of real lab work by real material scientists just to make it work, things like dendrite formation or swelling aren't part of this optimization (well at least AI stage), the linked preprint doesn't even mention dendrites once

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you’d know that if you read the article

Oof. You got me there lol.

I read the article and this one line stood out.

It stood out because half of what Murugesan would have expected to be lithium atoms were replaced with sodium.

This isn't new I think. Sodium-ion batteries were already known. Maybe there was still dendrite formation and this recipe might reduce or eliminate that? We'll have to wait and see.

In any case, if it can drastically reduce lithium usage that would be good progress.

[–] missing_forklift@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

sodium isn't electroactive there tho, it's just a part of electrolyte. also dubious if you can make savings on lithium work if one option for anode is solid lithium metal