Technology

37757 readers

268 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

242

OpenAI says it’s “impossible” to create useful AI models without copyrighted material (arstechnica.com)

submitted 10 months ago by sculd@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

244 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Apparently, stealing other people's work to create product for money is now "fair use" as according to OpenAI because they are "innovating" (stealing). Yeah. Move fast and break things, huh?

"Because copyright today covers virtually every sort of human expression—including blogposts, photographs, forum posts, scraps of software code, and government documents—it would be impossible to train today’s leading AI models without using copyrighted materials," wrote OpenAI in the House of Lords submission.

OpenAI claimed that the authors in that lawsuit "misconceive[d] the scope of copyright, failing to take into account the limitations and exceptions (including fair use) that properly leave room for innovations like the large language models now at the forefront of artificial intelligence."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's like the classic "objection!" "On what grounds?" "It's devastating to my case!" Scenario.

Throughout history technology has repeatedly been developed that lets people do things faster than the people currently doing it. That's usually the point of technological progress. Of course the people left behind by that will complain, but that alone is no reason to limit the rest of us who would benefit from the advance.

[–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

who benefit from automating creative process

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Anyone who enjoys creative things, since they now have access to a lot more of it a lot more easily.

[–] sour@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

is low quality

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Then it's not a threat to professional creatives, is it?

[–] sour@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

because average person always prioritize quality over low cost

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

How dare people have different priorities than you.