this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
2300 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59627 readers
4312 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] speff@disc.0x-ia.moe 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

... strain on RAM resources? What year is it?

[–] danielf@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Idk, twenty twenty-something. But Chromium with the YouTube homepage takes less RAM than GNOME Software and GNOME Shell, which either says I should move to Xfce or that Chromium has improved. Can't speak on VS Code though since I run that in a distrobox and podman is broken for me rn.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The year where a browser can easily eat up 10GB of RAM.

On my Mac mini with 8GB, just having Visual Studio Code open is enough to fill up the RAM. No other programs necessary.

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A Mac mini with 8Gb of ram is sadly not an appropriate config for programming anymore.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I just use it for building and deploying to macOS/iOS. I don't want to spend four digit prices just for that (I'm a freelancer).

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

8gb of RAM? What year is this?

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

A lot of more budget devices still have 4 and 8 gigs. Not to mention all the older devices.

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

yeah, but thats not an development environment (at least not an acceptable one for anything serious)

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Genuine question (I am not a developer): if you don't use a bloated IDE, what do you need this much RAM for?

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

I have no idea what people are talking about. My M2 MacBook with 8 GB handles pretty much all programming I do on it (biggest thing I've worked on on it was probably a 500k line C++ project). And I do use CLion usually which is one of the big IDEs. I'd go for more disk space before more RAM honestly. (Sure, my main machine has 64 GB but that's because I run huge compilation jobs testing distro packages, games, VMs, and a bunch of other stuff on it sometimes in parallel and especially the compilation jobs can easily take up 40 GB sometimes but I'd say that is not a usual use case.)

[–] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

Your WORKstation is for working. Budget devices are not for working.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

The new MacBook Pro Apple just released a few days ago comes with 8GB in the lower two tiers.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s 2024. 32GB is a min requirement. I roll with 128GB because it’s a couple hundred bucks to never have to worry about RAM.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah well, I can see how you don't run into RAM issues with 128GBs of it.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

Exactly. If you’re a dev, you should too.