this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
1193 points (98.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

5754 readers
2874 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Since no one really responded with a serious answer I'll go ahead and chime in.

The art itself my not carry a poignant message about our political world, but it exists in a political world and thus is political in nature.

It could be argued that everyone has an obligation to honestly and intellectually engage with the political nature of our world. And by not doing this an artist is choosing to ingore the political nature of their own reality

Choosing to "not be political" is itself a political stance. Regardless of whether or not it was a conscious one

(And yes, I know sometimes people just want to have fun. I'm not condemning fun. Just giving a serious response to the silly extreme example)

(Also, also there's a whole 'nother can of worms if you want to talk about art as commodity)