Asklemmy

43940 readers

452 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

174

Which software was ahead of its time? (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 months ago by Windows94@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

166 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kenbw2@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think its downfall was being a closed beta, which made it useless for communicating with other people who weren't already invited

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just like Google+ or Bluesky.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

Combined with Google's demand that every thing be The Next Big Thing, any closed beta is basically doomed. It worked exactly once, for Gmail, and only because of longstanding widespread demand for a big reliable e-mail service. Everything else had its initial obsessive weirdos and was left to rot on the vine.

Google+ only survived so long because they desperately wanted to undermine Facebook.