this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
376 points (99.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
1059 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] EscapeRhythm@feddit.it 12 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    What’s the best lightweight distro and desktop environment combo as of today?

    [–] JerkyIsSuperior@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Depends what you mean by "best". Personally, I use Lubuntu, as it is an ideal combo of features vs. resource lightness for me. Linux light and Puppy Linux are also among more popular lightweight distros.

    Personally, AntiX and IceWM have been the best combo for my old netbook. The lack of systemd does get annoying (some apps directly require it) so I've been considering WattOS as a replacement.

    [–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

    I use Arch with no desktop environment and it's fast af.

    [–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

    Best: Lubuntu with LXDE.
    Best if you enjoy pain: Arch with Gnome

    [–] gunpachi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

    If you like debian you could try crunchbang++ and Antix.

    Or you could install arch or void linux and configure it minimally with xfce or some window manager.

    If you want something fresh , checkout nixos. I have had nixos on my desktop for less than a month now and I'm already considering sticking with it for the forseaable future.

    [–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

    I like MABOX Linux. It’s pretty great and runs well on my dumb Chromebook. Puppy Linux is a solid choice as well.

    [–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 1 points 1 year ago

    @ @JerkyIsSuperior MX Linux with XFCE is a great choice if your PC/laptop is not that old. Otherwise, go with the lightest version or with Antix (from the same devs).

    [–] daniskarma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    For me it was arch, as you start literally with only the packages you chose. So you can go as lightweight as you want. You don't even have sudo unless you install it.

    There was also some debian image that was barebones and let you just install what you want. But I don't know if they still offer that option.

    Then you don't even go for a desktop environment, you can just use a window manager, like i3. It's more lightweight.

    The most lightweight I went without going server was with Arch+i3. But having to install everything you need can be tiring, specially because there are many things you don't know you need until you find yourself without them.

    It was a little experimental. For a functional thing you can try debian+xfce (though debian ancient packages can be flustrating), I"m generally fine with Linux mint + xfce or mate. It's not the most lightweight you can go. But it's easy to install and lightweight enough that will run in most hardware.