Technology

59739 readers

4152 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

637

Tesla Cybertruck gets less than 80% of advertised range in YouTuber’s test (nypost.com)

submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

156 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Tesla Cybertruck gets less than 80% of advertised range in YouTuber’s test::A YouTuber took Tesla’s Cybertruck on a ride to see if it can actually hit its advertised 320-mile range, only to find out that its could only reach 79% of the target. When YouTuber Kyle Conn…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] flyingjake@lemmy.one 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Idle losses are real but not very substantial in a modern engine compared to the bigger factor you're missing which is that in city driving tests there is a lot of speeding up and slowing down, ICE vehicles throw away all the energy used to slow down as heat in the brakes which makes city cycles particularly inefficient while an EV captures that energy through regenerative braking, dramatically reducing the net cost of those momentum changes.

[–] skysurfer@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ah, good point, the speed changes for ICE results in lots of energy wasted as heat instead of being recaptured. That would certainly be the largest loss for an ICE in the city cycle.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Regenerative braking only can recapture something like 2-5% of lost energy. The bigger factor is exactly what the other person said.

[–] murderisbad@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

This is just not true. Regenerative braking is much more efficient than that.

[–] flyingjake@lemmy.one 1 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure where that number came from but according to Wikipedia the conversion from momentum to electricity loses 10-20% and the conversion from electricity to battery storage is another 10-20% leaving a theoretical recovery at 60-70%. In real world tests, Teslas recovered 20-32% range with regenerative braking, a far cry from 2-5% you cite. https://electrek.co/2018/04/24/regenerative-braking-how-it-works/