Asklemmy

44003 readers

1107 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

372

What are some items that really aren't worth paying the expensive version for? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 11 months ago by kzhe@lemmy.zip to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

580 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I saw this post and wanted to ask the opposite. What are some items that really aren't worth paying the expensive version for? Preferably more extreme or unexpected examples.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You should buy AMD ones, but some of the newer models need to be selected a bit more carefully, as unfortunate as that sounds. ThinkPads were the gold standard, but they are now becoming the least bad one. That is all I can say, with my L470 pretty strong after 6 years, a HDD change, battery change and base cover change.

Unfortunate to hear you got a bit burnt.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, my new workplace selected it and paid for it, I just have to use it.

Personally I'd have gone with the AMD CPU, at home I rock a 5800X3D :)

Intel's power consumption is off the charts unfortunately. Those e-cores didn't help at all.

[–] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Intel is a joke, and it will only stop when they actually use lower nanometre node process, instead of stacking a + every year on top of +++++++ marketing stack.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago

Yep, even "efficiency" cores are a scam. They were forced to go that way because their current process simply can't support all full cores without drawing 300W+ and taking too much space.

Cut down E-Cores aren't even efficient power wise, just space efficient so they could fit them on the die.

Besides power consumption my trust for Intel is down the gutter with half a dozen security issues. Which were patched with performance degradation. So they fucked up, patched it in software, now your hardware runs slower than when you bought it.