this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
780 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59204 readers
3428 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's what I use (or Bluetooth) and I don't see how you can get more consistent.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Android Auto is the same screen on each vehicle and always in the center head unit area of each vehicle

When I drove multiple different vehicles for workas well as my personal the only consultant mount point was android Auto, all other phone locations changed and MANY were just ass to actually use my phone and the vehicles controls

You just plug your cable into the vehicles USB (if it supports AA it supports USB, Bluetooth was a recent addition) and your favorites apps/widgets are up on the head unit like always, no matter the vehicle

Though thats a fringe use case I guess

[–] virtueisdead@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

this is a phenomenal reason to disagree with me, i have no argument. if you use multiple vehicles on a regular basis through vehicle share or work, android auto sounds extremely useful. thanks for the reply

[–] saegiru@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The main argument I have against just phone + bluetooth is that you have to unlock your screen, keep it on, and it's a smaller size. I have wireless android auto set up, along with a magsafe case+charger, so my routine is to get in the car, slap the phone on the charger, and everything just comes up on my head unit display. For me it is way more convenient than having to deal with my phone display, and the larger screen is also better for navigation.

I have yet to hear any real negative points against AA or CarPlay for that matter, mostly it comes down to preferences like yours rather than actual interface issues.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I vaguely remember one of my cars supporting AA and I disabled it because I saw no benefit. Either it's not very intuitive or the apps I prefer to use don't integrate with AA.

[–] saegiru@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am not sure how it could be much more intuitive, at least from a touch screen perspective. It's just a touch interface with an app drawer, nothing much more to it than that. However, if it wasn't a touch screen I could believe it not being very nice to use, as I have a friend that has an Audi that does CarPlay but the screen isn't touch, so he had to use physical buttons to use the interface. THAT is definitely not good.

As for the apps, I use Signal, WhatsApp, Messages, Spotify, YT Music, Waze, and Google Maps and they all support AA, so at least for my purposes it does what I need from a car apps interface standpoint.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Other than Maps I use none of the apps you mentioned. Guess I'm not their target market.

[–] saegiru@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

What apps were you hoping for it to support?