this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
152 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

52 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Robtheverb13@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nothing would get me to delete my account quicker than federating with a Meta instance.

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

kbin probably federates with over 1000 other instances by this point. Would you really review ownership of each one of them?

[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re right. Reviewing ownership of all instances might be a bit unreasonable.

How about we just focus on the ones that stand out for things such as mass surveillance, conducting social experiments on their users, taking over markets, buying out competition, and influence upon genocidal political movements?

Does that seem a little more manageable?

[–] Robtheverb13@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

You put it more eloquently than I could. @dan does bring up good points. We can’t monitor everything. But Meta is sort of a whale in a pond of goldfish. It stands out. And I personally don’t think should be given any benefit of the doubt based on their history.