this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
506 points (93.5% liked)

Australia

3620 readers
256 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It barely fits in the bloody car park. So bad for pedestrians and the environment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaybb3rw0cky@aussie.zone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They should be allowed to drive them, but pay a price for them. Tax the absolute shit out them and don't allow it to be a taxable right off for "business purposes". But then I also say that should go for all four wheel drivers. 30 years ago the only people who had anything bigger than a station wagon were people that actually used them for recreational use. The argument of "it's safer for me to drive them" is the same argument people use when the gun debate is used - it's only safer because everyone else has one is not a valid argument.

People don't need four wheel drives - they have them because it's convenient. If you want that convenience then you should have to pay for it.

[–] TiredSpider@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

taxing them wont remove their massive blind spots that make them so dangerous. Even fwds have some use cases but these don't, to my knowledge there isn't any thing these stupid things can do that another vehicle cant do better besides maybe running over children, no one needs one of these.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not a fan and would never own one of these, but I think the usual argument in these threads is that these have a larger towing / carrying capacity.