this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
1409 points (98.4% liked)
tumblr
3382 readers
436 users here now
Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
-
No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.
Sister Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Even the basic - operator so rarely works as intended in any search bar anymore. I used to be able to ferret out anything from mountains of results that way. Now it just ignores the operator.
Something something you are the product.
They sell clicks, so uh yes
Quote marks to search for a specific phrase in order doesn't work either. I remember in high school in the very early aughts being taught these operators. Fucking shameful.
It ain't the innovation capitalists promised us, is it? Handicap the search engine so that people spend more time seeing ads, why not.
Quotation marks work well for me, still, after all these years, as their 2022 blog post claims.
They’ll find “him. But” when you search “him but”.
They’ll find “is not” when you search “isn’t”.
Saw them work in a singular and unscientific test a week ago.
One search to try on your favorite engine:
Google, Yandex, and Bing all pull it off. DuckDuckGo fails.
Ah, maybe you’re referring to this: on mobile, you have to ignore Google results below the DMCA removal notice. On desktop - none of those spammy “tiles” with video content and the like. On mobile - yes, after the 100% exact results, you get their attempts at hooking you into staying on the site.
I wonder why it works on bing and not ddg. I've also noticed using operators on ddg is not effective
There was this sweet spot where you could both ask it a question in almost natural language, but also use very simple operators to fine tune your results massively.
Then SEO became an offshoot of marketing, and it started to get worse and worse, until 90% of it was sponsored content of some sort
Now, I have no idea what's going on. It's like search engines have collectively decided "hey, remember that thing when we helped people find information they were looking for? What if we just didn't do that anymore?"
I just go to Wikipedia now, fuck them search engines.
Actually, their current events section is a great way to get the gist of things without giving clicks to corpo fearmongers.
I'll check that out, my questions are mostly very specific technical ones unfortunately. But after I forbid myself from Reddit, I do feel like I could use some new info streams...I feel healthier using Lemmy, but there is a bias... a bias I tend to agree with, but you need multiple viewpoints to circle in on the actual truth
Personally, I've been using language models. Not good for current streams, but for general, or even specific knowledge? Hugging faces hosts a ton of AI, if you find one trained for a specific purpose you can get pretty decent results directly.
Your mileage may vary, obviously
My guess is that it's trying to be helpful -- that if you (for example) type in a search for lucy and wardrobe and cordial it doesn't limit it to all of those things, but shows you everything.
Which is fine if you are new to the web, but if you do know what you want and are looking for the exact thing, then ten thousand results.....
I can see what they were doing ignoring the operators, but yeah -- it blows.
That's a very generous interpretation.
EXTREMELY generous. In fact, almost SUSPICIOUSLY so 🤔