this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
517 points (98.9% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
54500 readers
795 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, the point is to use a legit copy of this game to run burned copies of other games.
Which is silly for scalpers to try to profit off of this. You may get some short-term profits, but there are plenty of ways to circumvent copy protection on PS1 that are much cheaper and easier to work with than this.
It's also seemingly just an experiment that a dev decided to sneak into the game, so there's no guarantee that the loaded game will actually play reliably.
I'll wait for the hype to cool off and some real data about performance to exist before I consider buying it.
Oh yeah, this is a bubble, but fwiw, there should be minimal compatibility issues possible from my understanding as this is essentially the change disk mechanism we see in several games, but without the check that the correct disk has been inserted. Of course there'll be edge cases (and I'm gonna imagine there might be some late stage additional copy protection in some games that doesn't rely on the boot up checks), but on hardware as simple as the playstation it's going to be pretty much: if you're running the executable, you're running the game as if it's passed the checks