this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
158 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

34838 readers
23 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, no such payment network exists, or at least no such system is popular.

Adding that not all people can't affort to pay a monthly fee, maybe to one or two newspaper, but it's absurd tto create dozends of paid accounts to be informed. Worst in the case of research papers in some sites. That means that people have to pay a fee to dozends of sites or they remain ignorant abot important succeses in the world and maybe important informations for their studies. I'm from Spain and it's absurd for me to pay to Washington Post, NY Times and others for an ocasional consult an monthly fee. I'm an old retirée and need making money sudokus to reach the end of the month, paying already a lot of money, simply for the access to Internet. Fine for you when you can pay for every newspaper you visit for an information, but I have no regrets skipping the paywalls for an occasional piece of information.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's totally fair.

That said, the current choices are:

  • make an account, enter personal info, and pay a monthly fee
  • be tracked across the Internet by advertisers, who'll try to manipulate you into buying stuff

That's a crappy set of options, so it's no wonder people opt for ad blockers since both alternatives involve sharing personal information (which is likely to be exposed in a breach).

Instead of that, I want these choices:

  • microtransactions through my browser that pays for content I access (with a monthly cap)
  • privacy respecting ads served by my FOSS browser based on local browsing history (doesn't talk to the Internet)

Advertisers still get relevant advertising, but they don't get the personal information, just data about which ads were accessed due to which categories. Users could choose which sites to pay for directly, and which to pay for via ads, the only change is that privacy is preserved.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

I think that ads which are related to the content of the page you visit is the best solution, there are no adicional informacion needed, nor these from the browser or other sources, you visit a page with information related to computers and find ads and banners from computer brands. That is. It is absurd to see there food ads, because you visited before the catalogue of an supermarket which filled you with trackers. The only problem is surveillance advertising, which must be declared illegal, without these surveillance and tracking, ads ar not the problem and no more need of an half a dozen blockers and scripts to avoid this crap.