Programming

17553 readers

357 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

Unison | A friendly, statically-typed, functional programming language from the future · Unison programming language (www.unison-lang.org)

submitted 11 months ago by starman@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A friendly programming language from the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

functional languages aren’t battle tested or imply they aren’t useful in real world problem solving

Yup, I never said that, though? What I was about was to draw a parallel between functional programming languages and explorations from several decades ago vs the new languages and explorations going into effect typing/capabilities programming now (and the long way ahead for those).

What I find interesting is that those pioneering FP languages never came to top the popularity chart, implying that I'm not expecting Unison to be different (but the good parts might make it into Java/C#/Python/… many years from now).

[–] sknowmads@dormi.zone 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

All good, that was just how your comment read to me.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

Sorry if it came that way :)