this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
149 points (92.6% liked)

Videos

14329 readers
216 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean separately. Why limit it to a single charging system? What if you had 2 (DC) charging ports, each capable of only charging half of the cells? Many heavy duty trucks have 2 gas tanks, each with a separate fuel door. They can be filled by 2 pumps simultaneously, cutting refueling time in half. What about 4? 10?

Obviously there would be downsides (cost being a big one), but it would enable faster charging.

[โ€“] eerongal@ttrpg.network 2 points 11 months ago

I mean, this is still more or less what the fast charging standards do; they're pouring more power into it faster with higher bandwidth cables and sectioned charging.

The level 3 fast charger is basically the equivalent of 4 power cords from your wall. Also, adding more and more hardware and things for it will effectively make the electronics more complicated, which means more expensive, difficult to manufacture and repair

But also, as you scale this up more and more you'll start running into issues that make it difficult to start pulling more power; energy from the grid isn't infinite