this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
694 points (97.8% liked)

People Twitter

5283 readers
1085 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 93 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Okay, that is painful.

However, I think I’m going to start telling people that I was born in the mid-1900s.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What's the cutoff? My instinct is 1975 but then that gives a 50 year period for 'mid' and only 25 each for 'early'/'late'. So is the cutoff between mid and late 1966?

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I feel like early, middle and late aren't continuous, and there's gaps.
I don't think 1932 is early or mid 1900s.

Kinda like how young, old and middle aged don't have an immediate cutoff. A 31 year old is neither young nor middle aged, and a 54 year old is past middle aged, but they aren't old yet.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Funny how you see gaps. I feel they overlap. For decades Like 31-34 is early 30s, 33-37 is mid, and 38 39 are late. (Late being a smaller interval because everyone likes it that way.)

I think the about the same proportions work for centuries.

But I definitely see gaps in being young, old, and middle-age.

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've always gone 30-33 is early, 34-36 is mid, and 37-39 is late myself.

[–] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I agree here. This is what I go by

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hmm, I normally say (since I turned 30) that 0-29 are young, 30-59 is middle aged, and 60-89 is old (90+ is super old/ancient 😆).

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This hurts nearly as much as the OP.

Middle-aged starts at 30?! Fuck I’m old. At 53, middle-age didn’t start til 45, 75-89 is old, and I’d put super old at 95+.

Then again, I may be skewed a bit since my 88 year old dad is sharper than most people I know, still works his regular job in aerospace, and drives Uber in his spare time to keep himself young. He may live to 120 at this rate.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The problem with your scale is it's all over the place. If middle age doesn't start until 45 then is 44 young? Why are there 44 years of young, 30 years of middle age, and only 15 years of old?

Is this some imperial age measurement?

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because human life, aging, and experience aren’t linear, they’re logarithmic.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

Yeah, 66 is about right, assuming you split the century into three 33 year chunks.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

They'll think you're a time traveller!