this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
178 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

19 readers
1 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago
 

Actor Michael Imperioli has something to say about the Supreme Court’s Friday ruling in favor of a Christian web designer who refuses to create websites to celebrate same-sex weddings.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zd@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Being gay or trans isn't a protected class. The First Amendment and US Constitution trumps a class of anything.

[–] HipHoboHarold@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is a protected class

The first amendment is the thing you're missing with all of this. People can discriminate against gay people. But only if it takes away their first amendment. The courts ruled that art should not be forced. So they don't have to serve gay people. But if someone is selling a car, that has nothing to do with art.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is not a protected class at the federal level. It is in many states.

However, part of the argument in favor of making same sex marriage a right, as ordered in Obergefell, so that no state can refuse to marry same sex couples, is that the only difference between an opposite sex couple and a same sex couple is the sex of one of the people. Hence, the discrimination is on the basis of sex, which is a protected class federally.

Why that same argument wouldn't apply to the more recent web designer case is beyond me.

[–] Bluskale@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Why that same argument wouldn’t apply to the more recent web designer case is beyond me.

Ahh, about that, well… welcome to the new Robert’s Court, where the facts are made up and the precedent doesn’t matter.

From courtroom to Congress, it seems these days conservatives only look at getting things their way, with consequences & the nation at large be damned. At times there’s startlingly little ideological consistency being proffered to justify their actions, and sometimes they even punish other conservatives to force getting their way (see recent rejection of a multitude of bills in Texas because the governor didn’t get his favored legislation through, for instance). I don’t see how this can be kept up long term… it’s like venture capitalism has infected the government and we’re working on burning out all the assets still.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about a Subway sandwich artist? Can they refuse black people?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

True freedom is the realization you can literally do whatever the fuck you want.

(something something we live in a society ...)

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Homophobes hate gay people because of their sex. Not them having sex, but that they are the same sex and Ina relationships ship.

Sex is a protected class in the US, so logically sexuality would be covered by any common sense reading of the law.

Also the SCOTUS decision is pure bullshit as any creative work I causing commercial business is creative work and the free speech justification is bullshit.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sex is a protected class. There's no discrimination against gay or trans people that is not inherently discrimination based on sex. So no, it is absolutely a protected class.

Conservatives just allow their hatred of queer people to easily, easily, easily overcome their desire to appear to respect the law.

[–] YouShutYoMouf@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly.

Say a person has sex with a man. Is that person homosexual?

Depends on the sex of the person having sex with the man. Sexual orientation requires a person's sex to be considered.

You literally can't determine sexuality without looking at a person's sex, so sexual orientation is covered by sex itself being a protected class.

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

and being a lying pos doesnt give you standing. but here we are commenting on a case where someone lied to have standing and now rights are being eroded away.