this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
413 points (90.9% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3888 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 228 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This leaky headed geriatric piece of shit can go fuck himself

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 34 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Obama was mediocre but refreshing because he was actually present in many ways

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 61 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if I would consider him mediocre. His policies may not have been the greatest. However the nation's esteem while he was in office was unparalleled. There are always blind spots, but he was well spoken and inspiring. No President or most of Congress has even come close in the past 30 years.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Obama was basically the best brand and spokesperson for the Democrat neoliberal ideology but ultimately he was an actor of the US as a global hegemon.

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago (3 children)

As a non American I thought he was better than most you've had since, maybe Carter

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah, Obama was really popular on the international stage. But domestically, he was milquetoast at best. Still better than Biden by miles, but he was 100% a centrist who ran as a liberal. Hell, on the international stage, he was considered conservative. Because the USA’s political spectrum had always leaned pretty far right, so a moderate conservative seems liberal by comparison.

The issue is that the republicans adopted a party policy of “we don’t care what it is. If Obama wants it, we’ll oppose it.” Not because they were against whatever Obama’s policy was, but because they had spent so long vilifying him to their voter base. It was suddenly political suicide for a Republican to agree with Obama. After all, they had been telling their voters that Obama was a Muslim, a terrorist, a satanist, a communist, a socialist, unamerican, coming for your guns, and any other insults they could think up.

So when Obama won the election, they suddenly had to vehemently oppose a man who was… Slightly right of center? This meant the pendulum had to swing way past the moderate right and landed squarely in fascist territory.

If Obama had actually been any of the things they accused him of, they probably would’ve been more moderate when opposing him. But since he was a centrist, they suddenly had to pander to the racists, the misogynists, the xenophobes. Those groups had always been conservative… But Obama was the first time in a long time that conservatives started saying the quiet part out loud, and pandering directly to those groups.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 7 points 11 months ago

To summarize:

Obama pushed back race relations 40 or 50 years... because Republicans couldn't handle him doing well.

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yep, here is a live video of Obama interacting with opposing Republicans

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Captures Obama really well, I think he is the best the Democrats can offer in the current political era, the ideal person to carry the brand of the center-right neoliberal ideology of the party. I posted Adolph Reed Jr's take on him from 1996 in the comments which basically echoes this sentiment as well.

One thing that captures this is that America on the world stage basically is what it is, even someone like Obama, who was known to frequent pro-Palestinian talks and events, had to be pro-Israel in his role.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Clinton did an OK job (with some things).

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago

That's what Monica said

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Pretty accurate and also pretty sad.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 21 points 11 months ago

Never ceases to amaze me how US politics is so full of incoherently babbling clowns.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

My favorite thing about Rudy are his sexts with the assistant he was banging. They sound like someone who doesn't really know how to talk dirty but the partner really wants it.

"Those tits... those are MY tits. You like my tits? That's right, I own those tits. They're mine. Those are my tits."