this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
579 points (98.0% liked)

Funny

6874 readers
664 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I would argue that we have to be constrained by what is actually shown by the illustration and what is implied by it. It is implied that they all work together at the same time and if we're just making up things that aren't shown like an extra plane, we can make up anything.

[โ€“] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

A planetary gear set would have illustrated the point without breaking the laws of assumption.