this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
517 points (92.7% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4282 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The law ( the Leahy Law) requires that the US vet any foreign military receiving US arms. However, that doesn’t happen with Israel

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] young_broccoli@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

About 500 billion dollars worth of oil and gas is the answer.

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] young_broccoli@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There is an opportunity here to develop the gas fields in offshore Gaza, on behalf of the Palestinians," Hochstein told The National, adding “as soon as we get to the day after and this horrible war ends, there are companies willing to develop those fields.

You read "help" I read "colonialist looting". Guess only time will tell

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Pasting from my reply elsewhere in the thread

The main issue is as soon as the Genocide started all talk of aid and economy building went out the window.

...

The US just wants access to the gas reserves, they don't care who controls it, as long as they'll be aligned with the petro dollar.

Israel will control the reserves after the genocide is over, that's the point. Israel wants access to that revenue stream and bombing Palestinians is a really reliable way to ensure that.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lol people on here talking about the US wanting to genocide Palestinians and in the meantime were actively working to build them an economy for after the war

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The main issue is as soon as the Genocide started all talk of aid and economy building went out the window.

Read the article with a critical eye.

The US just wants access to the gas reserves, they don't care who controls it, as long as they'll be aligned with the petro dollar.

Israel will control the reserves after the genocide is over, that's the point. Israel wants access to that revenue stream and bombing Palestinians is a really reliable way to ensure that.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] young_broccoli@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But fossil fuels are a finite non-renewable resource. The more they extract the less they have left, and I doubt they are gonna wait untill it runs out to start looking for other sources.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

I'm sure they will have a team assess the ROI