this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
239 points (94.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
573 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    239
    Watching Updates on the terminal be like: (feddit.de)
    submitted 11 months ago by einfach_orangensaft@feddit.de to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    "manjaro" explains the problem very well actually

    [–] avapa@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Seriously. I used Manjaro for a short period about 5 or 6 years ago but ran into so many issues with it. Vanilla Arch on the other hand is very forgiving in my experience. I have a second desktop PC with Arch installed and I only update that machine once every couple of months when I actually need to use it. In my four years of doing that I never had an update break my system.

    [–] kattenluik@feddit.nl 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    I've used and come back to Arch for nearly 8 years now and Manjaro has always been a broken distribution and genuinely gives Arch a bad rep.

    Arch has always been a very stable daily driver for me, never breaking and never having issues with it. I'm always confused on what people are doing when they have issues with their entire distro breaking, especially since you pick all your packages and such anyways.

    [–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

    I've had a few breaking changes in 10 years of dailying Arch across multiple devices.

    Most egregiously one time a PAM update included a new PAM config... which got applied as .pacnew, but the new PAM config was critical and I could not login with a cryptic error message.

    That probably took me a solid hour to figure out, because config file conflicts is probably pacman's weakest point. At least apt starts conflict resolution by default.

    [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

    I don't think in this specific case it does, though. I had similar problems with a completely different distribution. I'm convinced that it's an upstream Qt or KDE issue where broken caches or changed cache formats don't get automatically invalidated and rebuild. In the case I vividly remember some lower level graphics library was updated and everything seemed to run fine but for some (and only some) users it resulted in Qt or some KDE component not being able to parse the cache any longer. After some research (under Gnome) I wrote a small script that quit Plasma and KWin, deleted all the caches (icon, font, ...) and then launched KWin and Plasma again. Worked fine and came handy on a couple of further occasions.