this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

992 readers
52 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
self@awful.systems
blakestacey@awful.systems
dgerard@awful.systems
37
Why Yudkowsky is wrong about "covalently bonded equivalents of biology" (titotal.substack.com)
submitted 1 year ago by titotal@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
NSFW 50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is my article on one of the dumbest and most obviously false claims Yudkowsky has ever made, about biology not using covalent bonds.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GorillasAreForEating@awful.systems 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The so called "experts" say that spider silk is stronger than steel, but steel beams can hold up bridges while I can break a spider web with my little finger. Looks like the "experts" are wrong and spider silk isn't very strong after all - probably because it's made of proteins held together by weak van der Waals forces instead of covalent bonds.

[–] jonhendry@iosdev.space 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@GorillasAreForEating @mountainriver

Yes but if you had a five ton, meter wide strand of spider silk…