this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
385 points (93.1% liked)

Games

32686 readers
1113 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm confused why Kotaku mentioning next gen in the title when Rockstar only commented on current generation PS5 and Xbox Series X/S.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bioemerl@kbin.social 27 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Why would you buy GTA 6 after 5 became a live service game? Fuck rockstar.

[–] atocci@kbin.social 43 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I mean, if the single player is still good, which 5's was too imo

[–] bioemerl@kbin.social -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Support bullshit and you'll eventually get what you supported.

When GTA loses its single player or riddles it with more mtx and live service crap, you'll only have yourself to blame for continuing to buy their crap.

[–] Goronmon@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So, in order to maybe not want to play future GTA titles in some theoretical future, you shouldn't play current GTA titles in order to discourage Rockstar from releasing these theoretical games?

The logic doesn't add up here, haha.

[–] bioemerl@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

All titles. Not just GTA.

Every live service game that makes money helps establish an industry standard. I'd rather Rockstar go out of business and have no GTA games if it means sending that message.

[–] Goronmon@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

"Live service" games have existed almost as long as gaming has been around, so I doubt that message is going to be sent anytime soon.

[–] bioemerl@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So long as people like you keep on buying their games, the trend will continue.

[–] knaugh@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

the trend will continue because people like live service games

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago

If you buy a SP game and they add MTX after thr fact, did you support the implementation of MTX?
If we get a SP campaign and don't play MP it will certainly be reflected in their data.
And believe: They will abso-fucking-lutely track the telemetry data out of it.

[–] johnyrocket@feddit.ch -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I am afraid they will make the whole game subscription based. You won't even be allowed to own the single player experience

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] III@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I don't think he needs a source - it is a fear. And not an entirely unreasonable one. Hell, car companies are chasing subscription payments for seat warmers in actual cars... the guy is a bastion of sanity.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

GTA V’s single player was worth $60 even if it never got any DLC. I don’t touch GTA online.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

If it hadn't been for reddit, I wouldn't have been aware that there was an online mode.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The amount of work and passion Rockstar brings into their single player experiences is by far worth the money. Bethesda needs to take a lesson from them.

Yes, they milk the multiplayer online experience for as much as they can get, but they are still working on new games in the meantime.

[–] histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago

honestly not a lot of people care game is still fun