this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Premier League

21 readers
2 users here now

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CyberfunkTwenty77@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

If Everton was hit with 10 points for ONE violation, there's no way 30 is sufficient for 100+ violations.

Fines + relegation is the only recourse. Not to mention Everton cooperated fully with the investigation and didn't stall for years. If the PL wants to maintain ANY credibility in terms of their financial rules, they have to bring the hammer down hard here.

[–] consciousarmy@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago
[–] McrRed@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Biggest thing apart from the sheer number of allegations is that city have blocked and obfuscated at every opportunity.

Everton complied with the investigation and even volunteered some information and got 10 points. City should have the book thrown at them. But ofc they won't

[–] Tater-Tottenham@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Assets should be seized (including trophies), all award money should be distributed to other clubs, and owner should be replaced immediately after verdict IF found guilty.