this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Books

1 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I LOVE Alfonso Cuarón’s sci-fi action movie Children of Men. I’ve watched maybe six times and every time, the ending always almost brings me to tears. So when I learned it was adapted from P.D. James’ book of the same name, it was a no-brainer deciding what my next book would be.

After finishing the book, it wasn’t difficult to reach to the conclusion that I enjoyed the movie better.

While James’ book gives a more in-depth look at how human infertility and humanity’s slow death march towards extinction affects the sexual dynamic between men and women and almost demented ways humans try to cope with a world without children or a race of dead men walking, I feel the book dedicates WAY too much time describing the failing of human civilization and the Regrets and guilt of Theo Faron. It’s not even until after 2/3 through the book where it feels like the plot and story are properly paced and stuff of consequence actually begin to happen.

The film’s adaptation by, comparison, feels consistent in its pacing and the world building and woe-is-mes of Theo feel more compact a take up less of the audience’s time.

What books do you feel were worse than its film adaptation and why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RandomHuman77@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Call Me By Your Name. The best part of the movie was how sensual it was, it made you feel like you were really spending the summer in Italy. The book has some of that, but no quiete. The last fourth or so also gets weird with their trip to Rome, if I recall correctly was someone giving monologues about desire. The book also has a flash-forward with Elio looking back at the events of the book from his adulthood, which doesn’t work as well as the fireplace scene in the movie.

Lastly, the book doesn’t have a Sufjan Stevens soundtrack.