You shouldn't compare apples and oranges because they are both great but for different reasons and purposes. It isn't anti-intellectual to recognize that apples are way better for pies than oranges are but if you want some amazing juice and don't want to go through a whole process to make it good; oranges are the way to go.

This and the many other examples I didn't want to fill this page with are the reason why it's a saying. It's much faster than prefacing what exactly said apples and oranges are going to be used for before giving a real answer and I personally feel it shouldn't at all be taken literally.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I don't disagree with you in spirit, the use case for most instances of the expression are to dissuade the act of comparison at all because the two quantities are so dissimilar that the correlations are irrelevant.

It is an anti-intellectual statement because it presupposes that the person doing the comparing is not able to distinguish between meaningful comparisons and ones which are irrational but support their argument. It ranks up there with "big words" as far as I am concerned, saying more about the person they are being said by rather than the person they are being said to.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So why not stand on that hill when it's relevant?

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do. That is a side effect of always standing on the hill. I am there when it matters, but also when it doesn't. Such is the curse of my superpowers.

Captain Pedant AWAAAAYYYY!

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

This made me giggle like a little girl