this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
434 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59237 readers
3524 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

ChatGPT is full of sensitive private information and spits out verbatim text from CNN, Goodreads, WordPress blogs, fandom wikis, Terms of Service agreements, Stack Overflow source code, Wikipedia pages, news blogs, random internet comments, and much more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 21 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Indeed. People put that stuff up on the Internet explicitly so that it can be read. OpenAI's AI read it during training, exactly as it was made available for.

Overfitting is a flaw in AI training that has been a problem that developers have been working on solving for quite a long time, and will continue to work on for reasons entirely divorced from copyright. An AI that simply spits out copies of its training data verbatim is a failure of an AI. Why would anyone want to spend millions of dollars and massive computing resources to replicate the functionality of a copy/paste operation?

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Storing a verbatim copy and using it for commercial purposes already breaks a lot of copyright terms, even if you don't distribute the text further.

The exceptions you're thinking about are usually made for personal use, or for limited use, like your browser obtaining a copy of the text on a page temporarily so you can read it. The licensing on most websites doesn't grant you any additional rights beyond that — nevermind the licensing of books and other stuff they've got in there.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Author's Guild, Inc. v. Google was about something even more copy-like than this and Google won.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That lawsuit was decided mainly on the 4 fair use factors. Google was considered to meet all of them. I don't think it's will be the same for OpenAI for example.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

No lawsuit has even been filed in the OpenAI example. But if one is we'll just have to see.