Premier League

21 readers

2 users here now

Rules

Keep On Topic
Give an objective and descriptive title
No Low Content Submissions
Provide Sources
No Stream Requesting/Sharing
No NSFW Content
No Duplicate Posts

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@soccer.forum

Is VAR going to cost the league popularity in the long term? (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by Alone_Consideration6@alien.top to c/premierleague@soccer.forum

119 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A debate is currently occurring about if it would be better to scrap VAR now of risk people turning off the sport due to time delays and bizarre decisions VAR Is making.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MiddleAgeCool@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It won't cost the league but it is going to continue causing a problem until they update the rules of the game and learn how to use VAR to enforce them. Right now, most of what we have is geared towards a non VAR world and a subjective decision by the on field ref. That needs to change.

Personally I think they should take the tennis approach. The captain and manager / coach have 3 (example number) VAR calls they can request per half. If the review shows that the on field decision should be overturned, they keep that call. If the VAR review sides with the referee then they lose a VAR call for that half. Everything else is down to the on field refs with the exception of offsides but only because I think that they could be automatically done in real-time in a similar way we have goal-line technology checking for goals.

[–] Alone_Consideration6@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

It would have to be the manager as the captain could be so far from the incident it would take a bit of time for them to get to the players who were closer to be told what everyone thinks. Also cricket and tennis crowds don’t scream for decisions in the way football crowds do.