Home Networking

198 readers

1 users here now

A community to help people learn, install, set up or troubleshoot their home network equipment and solutions.

Rules

Please stay on topic.
Please use the search function to look for keywords related to what you want to ask before posting since most common issues have been answered.
No Ads. This community is for support and discussion. Ads and self promotion are not welcome here.
No product reviews or announcements. If you have a question about a product, be specific about what you want to know.
Be civil. Don't be a jerk. Not being a jerk is surprisingly easy.
No URL shorteners. URL shorteners tend to hide the real use of a link. For this reason, please use normal links, even if they're long.
No affiliate links.
No gatekeeping. With profession shall come professionalism. Extend help without judging others for their ignorance. The same goes for downvoting of comments or posts for "stupid questions" or not being as knowledgeable as others.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@selfhosted.forum

rglullis@communick.news

Modem gives me static ip (Spectrum) (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by TestDummyAh@alien.top to c/homenetworking@selfhosted.forum

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Recently after trying to troubleshoot why port forwarding wasn’t working for me I found out my provider spectrum uses CGNAT and when I called to ask about a static IP they said that wasn’t an option. And they said I provided my own modem that I can setup my own static IP. At least to me this doesn’t sound right but I couldn’t find anything exact and wanted to see if this was true or is it best to follow the other methods of port forwarding such as zero tier or using a vpn with port forwarding.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] StuckInTheUpsideDown@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Charter has been quietly rolling out MAP-T. It's a little different than CGNAT but still involves multiple customers sharing an IPv4 address. However the customers are sharing a standard public address not sharing in the 100.x.x.x range. https://pc.nanog.org/static/published/meetings/NANOG71/1452/20171004_Gottlieb_Mapping_Of_Address_v1.pdf

You will see other ISPs worldwide rolling out CGNAT or MAP-T as well. They are all out of IPv4 addresses or close.

As you say you can do VPN based port forwarding. Wireguard / Tailscale work fine behind MAP-T. Or, just use standard IPv6.