Apple

67 readers

5 users here now

A place for Apple news, rumors, and discussions.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

communick@hardware.watch

-1

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro review - Efficiency before performance (www.notebookcheck.net)

submitted 10 months ago by Stiven_Crysis@alien.top to c/apple@hardware.watch

112 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SilasDG@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

what is totally easy and doable is impossible

Yeah I never said it was impossible. Don't misrepresent my argument just because you can't defend yours.

It's of course possible to charge the watch, it's just inconvenient to have to deal with multiple times a day. For 2.5 hours of not using it every day. You get less than a full days (24 hours) usage.

You're making excuses for Apple not competing, and blaming the consumer for simply wanting a product that competes, and isn't inconvenient.

[–] MC_chrome@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

For 2.5 hours of not using it every day

I’ve been using an Apple Watch for several years now, and I have never drained one of them completely in that time. The routine that /u/Apollo—User suggested works great, and hardly takes the 2.5 hours you’ve claimed