this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
-1 points (33.3% liked)

Apple

69 readers
11 users here now

A place for Apple news, rumors, and discussions.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SilasDG@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Because a watch that lasts 18 hours (apples rating after looking it up) means I cant sleep with it.

Why do I need to justify wanting longer battery life when competitors have offered 2-3 times the life for 7 years?

[–] Apollo--User@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

This is outrageous. It’s so easy to throw it on a charger while you shower. It would be great if the battery lasts longer but it’s insane to say you can’t sleep with it now.

[–] SilasDG@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

What a laughably bad excuse.

How long are your showers? Mine are usually about 15 minutes.

Per the US EPA the average shower is 8 Minutes

Per Apple the watch takes 2.5 hours to charge to full. 1.5 for 80% or about .5% a minute for the first 90 minutes

Even with my 15 minute showers I'd get a ~13% charge. That's a little of 2 hours worth of battery. Idk about you but generally I need at minimum 6, and try to shoot for 8 hours of sleep.

To get a solid 8 hours of life you would need a ~45% charge. So anyone who wants to charge this during a shower better be taking 50 minute showers at a minimum.

I don't think it's outrageous to suggest a company compete with on something a basic as battery life when their competitors have proven it possible for 7 years..

[–] Apollo--User@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Dude. Charge it when you shower and charge it while you’re winding down before sleep. I literally do it daily. You’re claiming that what is totally easy and doable is impossible. Get a grip.

[–] SilasDG@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

what is totally easy and doable is impossible

Yeah I never said it was impossible. Don't misrepresent my argument just because you can't defend yours.

It's of course possible to charge the watch, it's just inconvenient to have to deal with multiple times a day. For 2.5 hours of not using it every day. You get less than a full days (24 hours) usage.

You're making excuses for Apple not competing, and blaming the consumer for simply wanting a product that competes, and isn't inconvenient.

[–] MC_chrome@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

For 2.5 hours of not using it every day

I’ve been using an Apple Watch for several years now, and I have never drained one of them completely in that time. The routine that /u/Apollo—User suggested works great, and hardly takes the 2.5 hours you’ve claimed

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)