this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
666 points (97.7% liked)

Games

32696 readers
1972 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If 30% we're too high, surely just by offering a competitor that takes a lot less if a cut (say, 12,%), developers would flock to thst competitor because it saves them so much money, right?

Right, Sweeney?

[–] yukijoou@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, i think the 30% is fair enough, given the amount of stuff you get as a user by using steam, like

  • good cross-platform support
  • a working friendlist and chat system
  • remote play together
  • the workshop and community features
  • profile customisation stuff for those that like it
  • whishlists and gifts

i honestly feel like while they're a monopoly, they don't do anything other companies can't do, their cut goes to fund features others simply don't provide, so it's entierly fair for them to be more expensive than the competition

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

To be honest Epic now has a shopping cart... After almost 5 years of wait, mind you.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People don't buy games on the competitors, but yes may developers did flock to epic, which made everyone hate epic.

[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Eh, more like Epic approached them with a suitcase full of money, that's very different.

[–] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not even just that. They approached games that has already promised not to be exclusives, including kickstarter games that had already been funded with that promise, as well as buying games and removing them from other stores.

They were paying to have the games removed from better stores so they wouldn't have to compete. That is an example of anti-competitive practices, not just making a better product and charging more for it.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] hypna@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

People don't hate on Epic because their store has content. They hate on Epic because they tried to buy market share with exclusivity deals. Nobody wants PC gaming to turn into the streaming services.