this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
-7 points (48.4% liked)

Technology

60115 readers
2603 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah that would be all fine and well if it meant we're on track for some post-work egalitarian utopia but you and I know that's not at all where this is heading.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Oh, for sure, it'll definitely further wealth disparity, as automation always seems to in a capitalist system. But that's a societal problem that we continually have to address, and it spans nearly all fields of human work to varying degrees.

Fortunately, for the most part tech advancements are very hard to control. Progress can be impeded from spreading, but not stopped, and it means the average individual has access to more and more powerful tools.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately based on what I know of history it seems likely that humanity won't ever be on track to build a post-work egalitarian utopia until we've got no other option left. So I support going ahead with this tech because that seems like a good way to force the issue. The transition period will be rough, but better than stagnation IMO.