Technology

37757 readers

331 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

Palantir bags £330M NHS data bonanza despite privacy fears (www.theregister.com)

submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@beehaw.org

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

NHS England said no company involved in the FDP would be able to access health and care data without the explicit permission of the NHS.

...

Earlier this year, one official likened it to using Microsoft Word online. The cloud has access to that Word document, but the user would not expect Microsoft to be looking at that document, they said.

Oh good - administrative controls, rather than actual technical ones, "preventing" misuse/abuse of sensitive data. What could possibly go wrong?