this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
157 points (83.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6620 readers
132 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teft@startrek.website 21 points 11 months ago (3 children)

You also wont be able to see them with the naked eye. Imagine you're on patrol and your buddy drops dead and there was no sound and no visible sign except the crackling from the fire that carved a hole in his chest. War is already scary enough tyvm. Everyone is going to have to wear white or reflective gear.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

or reflective gear

It would be fun if the silver spandex of classic Sci-Fi turned out to be standard uniforms to counter laser fire.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just like with snipers today, although i suspect that giant laser is not optimal weapon in high stakes hide and seek game

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

If there's a constellation of them orbiting a few hundred kilometers up they'll be pretty optimal. Like fairly optimal. Sufficiently optimal.

[–] Narrrz@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

satisfactorily optimal.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You can't hide those from ground-based anti-satellite laser

It'll be like with GBAD in Ukraine but in space, and satellites can shoot at other satellites too

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Okay, hear me out: camouflage. Desert camo for the satellites orbiting between Earth and Mars. Ocean gray for satellites orbiting between Earth and Neptune. And we can get Hugo Boss to design the camouflage for the satellites between the Earth and the moon.

[–] LockMartRep@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

I like your style

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The atmosphere wants a word with you.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

we can shoot that too

[–] brianorca@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

If they are wearing white, all the better to see them, and use a variety of guns on them. Besides, no white is perfect, even when clean, (which won't last long) so the laser would still chew them up.

[–] cosmic_skillet@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Also depends on the frequency of radiation used. Does it reflect infrared or microwaves? UV?

[–] brianorca@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

All true, but nothing reflects 100% even in the best case.