this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
282 points (97.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29244 readers
1081 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Much easier to reject bad CVs. On the other hand every job post is the same and you have to check Glassdoor and Crunchbase before applying to a potential bad company

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 59 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I have to disagree. Job postings straight up lie. My husband got to his second interview at a place before they revealed everything from the posting and first interview was a lie and it was a door to door sales job.

Or they'll lie about the responsibility or the pay of the job and he won't learn that until deep into the interview process, which is costly in time, and stress, not to mention dressing up.

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I just recently got to the third interview for a software engineering job. 5 minutes in, they asked about my requirements for compensation and I gave a conservative range for a senior engineer role. They said "thanks for your time" and ended the interview. I spent 4 hours total on this to be told my comp request was too high. So fucking sick of this bullshit

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Leave them a review on Glassdoor. Call out their recruiting team.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Their recruiter sucks, because that should be one of the first discussions you have after initial qualifications.

I am genuinely curious how often this is policy vs just recruiters being bad at their jobs. Maybe they're incentivized to generate leads/candidates instead of actual hires? That kind of makes sense if senior leadership is dumb enough.

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The thing is that we discussed it in the initial call. They seemed fine with it. I'm guessing they got some sucker to take a lower rate

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

What a bizarre interview process man. Sorry you even had to be part of that. That's so dumb.

[–] netburnr@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Pay should be discussed before the first interviews starts.

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

The third interview may not have been the final one, believe it or not.

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Then these people acted in bad faith. When hiring someone, even if you have decided that this person isn't going to be the one, based just on salary or whater thing, you should still go through the process like normal and send off a rejection letter after. Cutting things short like that was just rude and unprofessional. You dodged a huge bullet here, honestly, because you'd never want to work for people who would treat you like that.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Going through the process despite knowing you’re going to reject an applicant is textbook “bad faith”.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

You don't qualify a lead before talking to the person. That's rule 1 of sales efficiency.

It's far better to waste an hour once figuring out a job posting was a waste of time than to waste 5 minutes 200 times finding out job postings are a waste of time.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

You vet them once they ask you for an interview/phone screen. Vetting takes a lot more time than applying. So apply, then if it matters, check them out.