vegan
Please also check out vegantheoryclub.org for a great set of well-run communities for vegan news, cooking, gardening, and art. It is not federated with LW, but it is a nice, cozy, all-in-one space for vegans.
We ask that the you have an understanding on what veganism is before engaging in this community.
If you think you have been banned erroneously, please get in contact with one of the other mods for appeals.
Moderator reports may not federate properly and may delay moderator action. Please DM an active mod if an abusive comment remains after reporting it.
Welcome
Welcome to c/vegan@lemmy.world. Broadly, this community is a place to discuss veganism. Discussion on intersectional topics related to the animal rights movement are also encouraged.
What is Veganism?
'Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals ...'
— abridged definition from The Vegan Society
Rules
The rules are subject to change, especially upon community feedback.
- Discrimination is not tolerated. This includes speciesism.
- Topics not relating to veganism are subject to removal.
- Posts are to be as accessible as practicable:
- pictures of text require alt-text;
- paywalled articles must have an accessible non-paywalled link;
- use the original source whenever possible for a news article.
- Content warnings are required for triggering content.
- Bad-faith carnist rhetoric & anti-veganism are not allowed, as this is not a space to debate the merits of veganism. Anyone is welcome here, however, and so good-faith efforts to ask questions about veganism may be given their own weekly stickied post in the future.
- before jumping into the community, we encourage you to read examples of common fallacies here.
- if you're asking questions about veganism, be mindful that the person on the other end is trying to be helpful by answering you and treat them with at least as much respect as they give you.
- Posts and comments whose contents – text, images, etc. – are largely created by a generative AI model are subject to removal. We want you to be a part of the vegan community, not a multi-head attention layer running on a server farm.
- Misinformation, particularly that which is dangerous or has malicious intent, is subject to removal.
Resources on Veganism
A compilation of many vegan resources/sites in a Google spreadsheet:
Here are some documentaries that are recommended to watch if planning to or have recently become vegan:
- You Will Never Look at Your Life in the Same Way Again
- Dominion (2018) (CW: gore, animal abuse)
Vegan Fediverse
Lemmy: vegantheoryclub.org
Mastodon: veganism.social
Other Vegan Communities
General Vegan Comms
Circlejerk Comms
Vegan Food / Cooking
!homecooks@vegantheoryclub.org
Attribution
- Banner image credit: Jean Weber of INRA on Wikimedia Commons
view the rest of the comments
Why exactly? Don't they have empathy for animals?
Not the message, the phrasing.
As for the empathy, most people live in active denial to be able to eat industrial meat. There is a reason the meat industry is nicely tucked away from public eyes wherever possible.
I appreciate what you mean. I wonder what it is about the phrasing. Calling them friends is too much? It's a term of respect, that's all. I care about my friends, and I care about animals. Friends not food.
I agree people are in denial about what they consume and what they do, and it's so sad. And I think you meant this anyway. But just saying, I think this can apply all animal products, not just meat. Which is important since I think dairy and eggs are the most cruel industries of them all.
I think the strong emotional appeal is what makes it off putting because people feel pushed into an opinion based on feelings. It’s a bit like the equivalent of anti abortion nuts screaming THINK OF THE CHILDREN and holding up signs of bloody fetuses.
I can't agree with this.
People pretty much only make decisions based on emotions. This is even pretty well established as the case in modern jurisprudence; judges work backwards based on their emotional presuppositions.
People don't like these sorts of comments, because they don't want to be confronted with the impacts of their practices, and experience the uncomfortable feeling of cognitive dissonance.
While I might use other language for carnists, they would not be happy with vegan arguments and discourse unless it is completely supportive of their position or otherwise silent. I don't see anything wrong with OP posting this sort of language in a vegan forum to vent.
To be honest I shared this with vegans who I thought might relate, it wasn't something I typically say to non-vegans, because in my experience, they make fun of vegans before they would allow themselves to truly engage with the idea of animal suffering/exploitation/killing etc by humans. So I would probably modify my language to be more facts-based and make them aware of the problems with animal farming/exploitation. If I see a living, conscious animal, that's immediately a "friend" to me and I respect them, so all animals are friends. I hope this inspires more kindness to them. But for others, the idea of that might seem worthy of ridicule.
I understand the resistance to "appealing to emotion", but I don't necessarily see that as a bad thing as a whole; if we're sure that being vegan is the right thing to do, then appealing to people's emotional side with how they view animals could be a useful tactic. Perhaps it would need to be less vague however, such as "animals are sentient, complex beings" rather than friends.
I would argue saying "think of the children" while holding up an image of an aborted fetus might be a bit of a misrepresentation of reality rather than just an appeal to emotion, at the risk of offending someone. Undeveloped, unconscious fetuses aren't equivalent to "children" or fully formed, conscious humans in the sense we typically understand it (e.g. a sentient human woman who would truly suffer from an enforced pregnancy), but it might lead people who don't know to believe they are. I don't think anyone really thinks I'm personally friends with every farmed animal who gets abused and slaughtered as a result of people's animal product purchases, so I don't think it's misrepresentative to call them friends as a general term of endearment for all sentient life.
But I take your point, I really do.
I have been thinking about this a bit more as well, because you are of course right on principle, people should feel empathy for the other creatures that share our world, and I also believe that most people are capable of empathy in general.
So it must be something else that makes it weird, and the only thing I can come up with is the anthropomorphization of the animals. People might agree on principle that we shouldn’t harm other beings, but might feel uncomfortable with the notion of treating them as fully equal to humans, even if it’s just on a subconscious level.
Unless you know those pigs personally, calling them friends is a bit much. The phrasing makes it seem as if somone entered your petting zoo and started slaughtering your animals.
I understand your message, but the hyperbole just damages it and makes other people think you're a bit off.
"Hello my friends" (says to complete strangers), or "My friends over in x country" (where you don't actually know anyone), for example. Wouldn't it also work in the human context, even if you don't know the individuals personally? Just wondering. I've heard "friends" used to refer to people you care about simply because they're humans and you acknowledge their (even theoretical) existence. So why not non-human animals as well?