this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
134 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

34984 readers
161 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

confabulating

I think this is a better term for it

Edit: ChatGPT == Trump[consummate bullshitter]? I feel like its "intentions" or "programming" are slightly above that but maybe not...

Edit: its interesting how a program can be written that basically replicates Trump's speech patterns in a replicable and recognizeable way. Where did Trump derive his speech pattern? Like, I know he reads Hitler speeches on his nightstand but is it only Hitler that informs his parole (individual speech patterns)?

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only issue I have there is that it isn't as widely known and understood. Also if you say someone is confabulating, it means they don't realize that they are bullshitting, whereas language models are literally designed to bullshit in this manner.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Confabulation

  • An informal conversation
  • (psychiatry) a plausible but imagined memory that fills in gaps in what is remembered

Like there's no perfect analogy but I am partial to this characterization, I dunno.

Discuss aha

Edit: I really hope I'm not the originator of this, don't need that in my life right now. It just seems to fit better imao

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know what it means. For me it also implies an attempt at saying something which is true, even if simply interpolating from other facts. It doesn't fully reflect the total indifference to reality that is exhibited by language models

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Reticulating splines.