this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1928 points (98.0% liked)

piracy

607 readers
15 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aidan@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, it is from a 19th century socialist, this sort of language isn't easily understood by most people in the modern day. And to act like it should be so insightful to them is sophistry.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm not taking offense that they didn't understand the argument. I'm taking offense that they openly admitted to not reading it, and then attempting to summarize what it said, poorly. If that's sophistry, so be it. They're being willfully ignorant.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, what you posted is insanely hard to actually read. Putting the whole quote as the link and not having any paragraphs makes it so much more taxing that yeah, I noped out halfway through when I realized I read the same thing three times, except it wasn't, because they draw parallels that would have been obvious, if they were formatted. Kinda like how that last sentence was painful to read.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I didn't post it. I just interpreted it.