Australia

3605 readers

64 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
Politics, post it to Australian Politics
World News/Events, post it to World News
A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

Fluid@aussie.zone

bestusername@aussie.zone

eatham@aussie.zone

McDonald's loses out in legal beef with Hungry Jack's (www.abc.net.au)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MHLoppy2@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A court has ruled a Hungry Jack's burger did not infringe on McDonald's trademark.

McDonald's argued its rival's product could confuse consumers and eat into its profits.

A scientist was brought in to weigh the two-patty burgers over the three-year trial.

McDonald's has lost its legal dispute with fast-food rival Hungry Jack's over its Big Mac lookalike burger the "Big Jack".

The American giant had claimed that consumers would confuse the Big Jack with the Big Mac and this would eat into McDonald's profits.

But Justice Stephen Burley ruled against the claim in the Federal Court today.

"Big Jack is not deceptively similar to Big Mac," Justice Burley said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

But Justice Stephen Burley ruled against the claim in the Federal Court today.

They reckon Aussies are confusing the Big Jack with some American burger," the ad says.

McDonald's disputed the claim, and two experts were called in during the trial to compare the two burgers – including a scientist with a PhD in analytical chemistry.

The experts travelled around Brisbane and Melbourne weighing burgers from more than 50 Hungry Jack's and McDonald's stores.

"Hungry Jack's has engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct in breach of section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law."

The battle of the burgers between McDonald's and Hungry Jack's lasted for more than three years in the court.

The original article contains 479 words, the summary contains 112 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!