this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
75 points (85.7% liked)
Android
717 readers
5 users here now
Android news for android developers. Everything that happens in android world.
For Android development specific topics please see /c/android_dev
The Android robot is reproduced or modified from work created and shared by Google and used according to terms described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The ecosystem is very different and there's definitely a more open platform on Google's side still, but the perception that Play is catching up to the iPhone App Store has not been a thing around here for ages. I mean, discovery is borked across the board on both at this point, and breaking out with new content through placement is a nonstarter.
And hell no, nobody uses "third party platforms". They use the Play Store. Nobody is in Samsung or Amazon's weirdo alternatives. Those are not a thing, except for the five apps Samsung insists on making you update that way for some reason. It's Play or nothing. If you're developing phone apps and you're not on the Play Store you're dead. I haven't spoken to a mobile developer that was targeting anything but the App Story and the Play Store... ever.
I thought I knew how that worked in the US, but maybe you're talking about something different here.
3rd party platforms as in messaging services, not apps stores.
Ah, got it. I thought you were still talking about the Play Store there. It's telling that I didn't even categorize Whatsapp that way instinctively, though.
I think maybe because I also don't think of SMS as a "first party" thing, since it's a pre-existing standard, not an Apple or Google thing at all. In my mind SMS is a public service thing, like AM radio, and messaging is a completely different application.
It probably shows how successfully Apple appropriated it in the US, which I admit I keep forgetting.
A natural consequence of more flexibility and openness is the potential for abuse. That's not a bad thing mind you. Imagine if Android was as locked down as iOS, it'd be horrible for everyone. As for which is better, eh, opinions and preferences. If the world's largest search provider could fix the searchability (lol) of their app store it would be great. Apple has a similar issue. If you're in their App Spotlight you've going to see huge amounts of traffic to your app, but for everyone else it's chopped liver. On the topic of third party, I wonder if more repos in the style of F-Droid would help. Apple is getting force fed third-party apps next year in the EU, and I'm looking forward to the benefits.
Yeah, for sure. I was thinking less of the existence of abuse and more on the narrative of abuse. Apple had some success early on presenting itself as the only place to do serious business on mobile development because the Android alternative was a wild west of malware where you couldn't monetize or discover at all.
That narrative faded and now the perception of Android is probably closer to Windows on PC than to old Android. Yes, you can run wild, but by and large the commercial ecosystem is safe, secure and as business-friendly as the postapocalyptic tardocapitalist wasteland of mobile development gets these days, I suppose.
I am very curious to see what happens with sideloading on Apple, too. I'm guessing as little as possible, if Apple can get away with it.