this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
573 points (97.8% liked)

science

14767 readers
46 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like you were just looking for an opportunity to spew your own misogyny. It came rather easily if not even a bit eagerly to you for an argument against it.

and despite how youre trying to sell it, it’s not ‘calling out’ someone when you precisely example it like you’re talking to a child.

And it is derailing, which is hypocritical.

And it’s aggressive.

So It misses the point your tying to argue it makes on so many levels.

[–] spookedbyroaches@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It came rather easily if not even a bit eagerly to you for an argument against it.

I don't even know what that means.

I was being aggressive by illustrating different situations to show that it's unacceptable to anyone to make sexist jokes. But when it's a sexist joke against men you don't seem to care.

But what the hell am I derailing? The article said that suicides and overdoses are on the rise which cause early deaths disproportionately for men. Then the commenter said some dumb shit about health choices from Joe Rogan. There is no conversation here, OP just saw a chance to shit on meatheads but chose the wrong time and place.

And most importantly:

and despite how youre trying to sell it

*You're

So It misses the point your tying to argue it makes on so many levels.

*You're

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And most importantly:

and despight how ur trying to cell it

So It missuz the point ur tying to RGew it makes on so many levels.

Better?