this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
259 points (82.8% liked)

Anarchism

1286 readers
1 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/8181688

undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sab@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, Orwell writes in Homage to Catalonia that even though he fought alongside Communists, he was there to fight against fascism, not for communism. I think it makes sense that the communists are not all that eager to praise him; that they are too ignorant to read him is their loss.

No matter how you put it, Stalin was certainly a more effective anti-Communist!

[–] Ulzana@mastodon.social 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

@sab @db0 @boredtortoise @novibe

Actually he completely supported those he fought with. The "Poum" were Trotskyists, and could call themselves Communists.

Orwell had no problem with them, and there's Nothing in "Homage to Catalonia which attacks their ideals.

[–] sab@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

True, I always read him as at least sympathetic to the original communist struggle, no matter how much he despised Stalinism and authoritarianism.

It does, however, make sense that people who in all likelihood consider themselves Stalinists wouldn't be the biggest fans of Orwell. What doesn't make sense is that these morons still exist at all, but that's a different issue entirely.

[–] Ulzana@mastodon.social 2 points 10 months ago

@sab @db0 @boredtortoise @novibe

I have an astonishing book at home released by the Soviet Union while Stalin was head of the Communist Party.

It's a verbatim summary of some of the purge trials, and the lawyers for the defendants might as well have been the prosecutors.

In fact it reads like fiction, except that it's a real book. Beyond belief that Anyone could support this mass murderer.