this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
261 points (82.9% liked)

Anarchism

1377 readers
103 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/8181688

undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Personally, I think that someone leading insurrections against institutions that have overwhelming popular support due to actively working to give people healthcare, food, etc. is clearly a counterrevolutionary prick and an anarchist who opposes a project that feeds the children for the first time in centuries because it's not a syndicate is being myopic at best, but that's just me.

10000-com

If we were in a hypothetical revolutionary situation led by anarchists that was genuinely and successfully challenging state capitalist power here in the UK then I, as a Marxist-Leninist, wouldn't be like "Erm, guys, you haven't sufficiently considered Lenin! Aren't you aware that the hijacking and reconfiguration of the state for socialist purposes is a necessary transition period towards communism?" I would get behind the fucking barricades with them.

There's a difference between opposing lesser evilism in the context of Western capitalist electoral politics between two bourgeois parties, and like, being anti-ML or anti-anarchist in actual revolutionary situations (and not stupid fucking hypothetical internet arguments) because "it's not doing communism right." Unless there were like, REALLY fucking big problems with what the group is doing, I would just shut up and not weaken the overall movement. As Awoo stated, this is literally what ML groups are doing in Palestine as we speak.

[–] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Would it be a better idea to join the anarchists, or form a Marxist Leninist and Anarchist coalition?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we were in a hypothetical revolutionary situation led by anarchists that was genuinely and successfully challenging state capitalist power here in the UK then I, as a Marxist-Leninist, wouldn’t be like “Erm, guys, you haven’t sufficiently considered Lenin! Aren’t you aware that the hijacking and reconfiguration of the state for socialist purposes is a necessary transition period towards communism?” I would get behind the fucking barricades with them.

That's exactly what happened in Spain though. The revolution was an anarchist affair, and while MLs fought with, they demanded anarchists become MLs if they wanted bullets.

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they demanded anarchists become MLs if they wanted bullets.

Stalin literally gave them hundreds of tanks

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To whom, under what conditions. We have plenty of evidence that Stalin wanted to crush the anarchists in spain. Again, I don't go into the debate here. There's plenty of other people who will happily debate you on this

[–] Autonomarx@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They did the same thing in supporting the Kuomintang from the Japanese conquest of China right up until the Maoists pushed them out of the mainland. Do you think that perhaps inferior methods of military and industrial organization could have played a part in this, or should Mao have called Stalin red fash and given up?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

It's very convenient when Stalinists betray anarchists and then blame them for the results of that betrayal. Every situation is not the same mate. China vs Japan is not half of spain VS Franco and Hitler.