this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
261 points (82.9% liked)

Anarchism

1394 readers
15 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/8181688

undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait I didn't mean to criticize citations I love citations mb.

What did I say I'll edit it

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hexbear comes here to be the debate bros they try so hard to dunk on.

What sort of behavior are you critiquing here?

Personally I think "debate bro" stuff is more arguing for the sake of arguing/bending over backwards to defend even trivial or weak points, maybe with a sprinkling of going back-and-forth long after it becomes clear you're at an impasse. I don't see a lot of that here anyway.

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It involves a wide variety of behaviors, including the stuff you said, but primarily the first thing that comes to mind for me is the behaviour of trying to force/coerce people to engage in debates/discussions that they don't want to have or are otherwise unprepared to have, usually on the bad-faith preposition that anyone who is unwilling to participate in said debate/discussion must only be unwilling for the reason of being wrong.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

debates/discussions that they don't want to have or are otherwise unprepared to have

I see your point, but I think this is seriously undermined when you have someone like OP who is willing to post all day about this, and occasionally willing to dip their toes into trying to raise real points, but then throws up their hands and says "hey it's just a ~~joke~~ meme" whenever they're in a tough spot.

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, IMO it was more like they attempted to engage in response, and then tapped out when it went over their head. Or maybe they just got busy IRL.

It doesn't seem good to me to try and rationalize shitty behavior just because of a reason someone might deserve it.

Also tho, if you wanna call them a lib and consider them officially dunked, you don't need a certain response from them for it to work, you can just decide that.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or maybe they just got busy IRL

Looks like they've been posting pretty hard in this thread for at least 6-7 hours, often multiple paragraphs at a time.

It doesn't seem good to me to try and rationalize shitty behavior just because of a reason someone might deserve it.

It's not shitty behavior to make a political response to a political meme, or to point out when someone isn't having a good faith conversation.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Remember, I'm replying to 12 people here. Y'all are replying to just me.

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

It’s not shitty behavior to make a political response to a political meme, or to point out when someone isn’t having a good faith conversation.

Yes, but I'm not taking issue with just making political responses or pointing out bad-faith conversations. I'm taking issue with attempts to force/coerce engagement in a debate/discussion when someone doesn't want to or is otherwise unprepared for debate/discussion.

I'm not trying to say any of this in the interest of proving anyone wrong or right or whatever. I would just like to see less of that behavior.