this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
677 points (94.6% liked)

linuxmemes

20761 readers
2017 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I use plasma, BTW

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Borderline impossible if you aren't using a distro designed with that in mind. Pretty much everything that isn't a program you directly start (e.g. sound system, desktop environment, bluetooth daemon etc.) either only provide a systemd unit to start them (which you'll have to manually translate into e.g. a shell script if you want it to work with your new init system) or is entirely reliant on systemd to function.

Your choices of distro if you don't want systemd are Debian, Void, Artix, and Gentoo, and afaik that's about it.

Replacing components of the systemd suite (e.g. using connman or networkmanager instead of systemd-networkd) isn't actually that bad as long as your DE has support for them, but replacing systemd itself is something you are building your entire system around.

[–] pascal@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your choices of distro if you don’t want systemd are Debian, Void, Artix, and Gentoo, and afaik that’s about it.

IIRC Debian was one of the first distros implementing systemd.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 10 months ago

It still leaves sysvinit as an option. Debian doesn't lock you into systemd. Heck, it doesn't even lock you into Linux -- you can use Debian on top of the FreeBSD kernel if you so desire