44
Biden condemns ruling against race-conscious admissions: ‘This is not a normal court’ – live
(www.theguardian.com)
@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.
But, in reality, AA was there to balance the racial diversity. Living in Asia I'm seeing that university exams are exploited by a rich families here who know how the system works. Rather than evaluating the applicants' academic abilities and potentials, the system usually evaluates the family supports like financial power.
The paper tests are hacked, meaning that too many applicants reach the maximum score practically possible. What then gets to the stage is wealthy participants' personal project to save the society, supported by their rich family. This works effectively because such a project can be bought by money and shows that the kid can follow through with their aim.
I imagine that AA in the US had been a way to contain these hacks and provide education to more diverse people. It was a notorious tool, but I imagine that it helped enroll more Black people into higher education.
If universities did a fair examination, the racial balance should be established anyway. As the balance is heavily skewed by hacks, it makes sense to re-balance the race to what it should be.
Yes, but education is indeed a supreme fix for those problems.