this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
511 points (97.4% liked)

Memes

45649 readers
1293 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Same question as No Man's Sky, though. Sure, the game wasn't good on release... but they stuck to it, fixed it, and now it's better. So what matters more, that they screwed up initially or that they managed to patch it up over time?

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yea CDPR doesn't really belong in this picture. They always put in a ton of time and effort on their releases to make right by the fans. The other guys, not so much...

[–] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Arr you nuts? Of course they belong. They released a game that delivered nothing of what they promised, and it straight up didn't work on old Gen consoles. They are absolutely guilty.

[–] tilcica@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

players complained about delays so shareholders told them to release an unfinished game, players complained about unreleased game

just cant make some people happy

[–] TehBamski@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And this is exactly why OG Blizzard (WarCraft 1 (1994) to StarCraft 2 (2010)) was so beloved. They saw that they could stand to make games that lasted well past their 1 - 2 years after launch, in making them money long term.

Blizzard Entertainment leaders were often quoted as saying, "It's ready when it's ready.", and "We won't release it until it meets our standards." Hell... it even became a meme that they would be asked when a game would be coming out, and they would just reply with "Soon."

[–] sviper@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Mad respect for them

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)