this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
63 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30429 readers
211 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ComputerSagtNein@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel that's an unfair thing to say. Lets be real here, the Creation Engine that runs Starfield isn't the same engine that runs Fallout 4 or Skyrim. It's a new version of that engine. When Unity, Unreal or Anvil (just to name a few) release new versions of their engine everyone is like "wow, so much better, so much more possibilities" When Bethesda releases a new version of the CE, everyone is like "Yeah but it's still the garbage CE" although the CE is a very powerful engine when you think what it really enables them to do (and how easy accessible it is for modders)

My point is, of course we can end up with a CPU bound game again, but before we know for sure, we should give Bethesda the benefit of the doubt.

[–] HiT3k@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk, facial animation is still honest to god the worst in the industry. Worse than Gollum. Can't blame people for saying it's the same engine when the faces you spend 30% of the game staring at look as bad as they do.

[–] ComputerSagtNein@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, the lack of animations in general is something that bothers me about Bethesda games. I am currently playing RDR2 and people in this game actually feel like people, not videogame characters.